What the Ban on Campaign Finance Is about
There is actually a need to point out that the courts have opted to maintain the ban on corporations extending donations to political campaigns. There is a good number of Americans whose interest is to see the part played by money in politics being put under control. This is what has made so many people to eagerly wait for the ruling so as to know what role the corporates will take in financing politics in future. The decision by the Supreme Court will certainly not be welcome for all. They refused to lift the ban on this political campaign finance law. As you go on reading, you will discover more about why this ruling was taken into account.
It is important for us to start with understanding that nothing new took place in the court. The Supreme Court simply chose to not to consider the challenges to the current campaign finance laws. This means that corporates will not be allowed to donate any money to both campaigns and candidates. This is what has brought about the checking of the role of corporations in matters to do with politics. In the previous ruling, you will learn that corporates were often allowed to contribute to the campaigns. This would have been allowed in case the money was not directly associated to particular individuals. You will learn that this case was brought to court by two companies from Massachusetts. This case was purposed to enhance financial responsibility and even economic opportunities. It will actually be more prudent for you to consider a good lawyer in case of such a big case.
It is also important for you to understand the legal argument behind this particular case. You will find that these companies argued that the first amendment rights of companies was barely being observed. They argued that freedom of speech will time and again be compromised by these political donations. They also invoked the constitution which seeks to protect every individual equally. While at it, non-profit and even charity organizations are not allowed to donate to these campaigns. This means that they are treated differently from corporate entities. This does conflict what the constitution basically stands for.
It is imperative to mention that what the high court ruled was still favored. This ruling claimed that corporates are not allowed to donate money to political campaigns. This is due to the fact that they can spiral to corruption in politics. It is for this reason that no political candidate will be at liberty to receive any donation from corporations.